Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Glossary"
From Anarchy Online Wiki [AOWiki]
old_Angels (talk | contribs) |
old_Landcast (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | '''DOH!''' -- [[User:Landcast|Landcast]] 19:41, 22 Jun 2005 (CEST) | ||
+ | :hehe okay now i got it.. | ||
+ | |||
'''Eh''' --[[User:Angels|Angels]] 19:37, 22 Jun 2005 (CEST) | '''Eh''' --[[User:Angels|Angels]] 19:37, 22 Jun 2005 (CEST) | ||
: Landcast, i guess you missunterstood the "Category" site type. Either we follow the category type way of the glossary (adding one page for each glossary entry) or moving it to a simple page (where all glossary entries are on) ... but i wouldn't mix it like it is now. My favorite would be the category type way, cause you simply can lookup the page by adding the pagename to the aowiki.net/NAME url. | : Landcast, i guess you missunterstood the "Category" site type. Either we follow the category type way of the glossary (adding one page for each glossary entry) or moving it to a simple page (where all glossary entries are on) ... but i wouldn't mix it like it is now. My favorite would be the category type way, cause you simply can lookup the page by adding the pagename to the aowiki.net/NAME url. |
Latest revision as of 17:47, 22 June 2005
DOH! -- Landcast 19:41, 22 Jun 2005 (CEST)
- hehe okay now i got it..
Eh --Angels 19:37, 22 Jun 2005 (CEST)
- Landcast, i guess you missunterstood the "Category" site type. Either we follow the category type way of the glossary (adding one page for each glossary entry) or moving it to a simple page (where all glossary entries are on) ... but i wouldn't mix it like it is now. My favorite would be the category type way, cause you simply can lookup the page by adding the pagename to the aowiki.net/NAME url.